it seems to the rest of the population that the best solution was to close the schools in the worst location and with the smallest population, and build new schools at two locales to ease on travel time, athletics consideratoin, etc...


ill never understand how two schools at one location that creates all sorts of travel time is a better solution than on two separate ends to reduce travel time and size in one place.

i just cant figure it out.
i understand the financial considerations, but is this really the best solution?
i dont think the powers in charge spent enough time really deciphering the best solution. either way, im not sure this is the right plan of action